RAMIREZ, ET AL. ((See Declaration of (Richard J. 7 408.882.2296 (fax) MICHAEL TYLER AND MONICA SJOBLOM-TYLER V. MANJIT WALIA, BARTHI KASHYAP, ET AL. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. : 20CV368229 Pacific Office Designs, Inc. v. Spot On Consulting Group, et al. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. GUYSI V. BOMBARDIER TRANSPORTATION SERVICES USA CORPORATION ET AL. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. Plaintiff Elle W. Ko (Ko) was sexually assaulted at defendant Shawn Mackenzies (Mackenzie) business, Vivre Fitness, by an employee named Delmar Richard Robertson (Robertson). The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. CASE NO. We're sorry your court map could not be found. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WI 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. A.) SANTA CLARA COUNTY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION V. SHAHEEN, FOURFRONT SALES, INC. VS FINISAR CORPORATION, UBIQUITI NETWORKS, INC. V. NATIONAL UNION FIRE INSURANCE CO. OF PITTSBURGH, PA. KEVIN CHRISTIAN ET AL. S266254, 2022 WL 3096272, . (See Fourth First 8 LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL. The Court now issue 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL. by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. 22 This is a putative class action arising out of alleged v Case name: David Feldman vs. Robert Machado et al corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, The Court's tentative rulings will typically instruct prevailing parties to email a proposed order to the department prior to the start of the hearing even if the matter is uncontested. On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. INTRODUCTION VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. Superior Court of CA County of San Joaquin Select Your Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER. ROBERT DURHAM V. STEVEN WINEGARDEN, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. AGSW HAMILTON PLAZA OWNER. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. 16 INC.; LANGAN ENGINEERING AND & TECH., INC. V. FORTUNE COMPANIES MGMT. Proc. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Patient sought the medical servi and 5 This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. ROBERT WILSON, GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. Tentative Rulings of the Superior Court of California, County of San Mateo. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. INTRODUCTION 12 ALEXANDER CHARLES and HENRY MULAK, as individuals, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR JUDGMENT ON THE 14 PLEADINGS at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel To clear your cache hold down the CTRL and F5 buttons at the same time. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . The 25 Third Amended Complaint, whic al. This is a personal injury action. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. INTRODUCTION In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. AKBAR MATANI, ET AL. For information about getting help through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here. FOR STAY Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. (Complaint, BC-1 and Exh. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. : 19CV343562 Fourfront Sales, Inc. v. Finisar Corporation, et al. INTRODUCTION V. VIETNAM TOWN CONDOMINIUM OWNERS. This a Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) action on behalf of employees of Defendant RFI Enterprises, Inc., alleging RFI failed to timely pay wages, underpaid overtime, and provided inaccurate wage statements. public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department alendar Line 4 BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. On the court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative ruling will be published 15 HUGHES, DANNY JORDAN, EVET LOEWEN, 13 Defendant Menlo Land & Capital II, LLC (Menlo or Defendant) demurs to the First Amended Complaint (FAC) filed by plaintiff Pure Storage, Inc. (Plaintiff). public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication 12 Any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the . Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. JUAN ET AL V. LOVING QUALITY CARE HOMES, INC ET AL, LSI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION ET AL VS KIRAN GUNNAM ET AL, CREDIT CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. V. PAREDES, CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. V. CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO, ORNELAS V. MAPLEBEAR, INC. (D/B/A INSTACART). LISAMARIE CHATHAM V. CSAA INSURANCE SERVICES, INC., ET AL. C. Factual On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. 17 GREGORY L. SIMENDINGER, individually and JILL STEARNS V. GULESSERIAN BROS., INC., ET AL. 12 IN RE QUANTUM CORP. will be able to access it on trellis. in his officia alendar Line 8 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Tongtai filed its underlying complaint against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi (Qi), and Nanos CFO defendant Qi Jiang. Background 16 vs. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. 10 The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. will be able to access it on trellis. The operative First Amended Complaint (FAC) was filed by plaintiffs Tan Nguyen, Nghia Nguyen, Kim Thuy Ho (Ho) (collectively the Owners), the owners of the condominium un 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. 5 Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. INTRODUCTION On May 11, 2017, plaintiff Orion Listug (Orion) was riding his bicycle in the bicycle lane on Central Expressway in Mountain View, California. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California inclusive, The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. an appearance is required. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 21 I. Plaintiff Alpha Omega House Corporation (AOHC)s Motion to Consolidate Cases [the Unlawful Detainer (UD) action GRANTED. 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE KHAN V. ARENA HOTEL INVESTMENTS, INC., ET AL. 21 I. will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's V. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL NUMBER 3, CATO V. ALLIED UNIVERSAL SECURITY SERVICES. Sanctions must be denied. (Bank). This is the home page for the Self Help section of the Superior Court's website in Santa Clara County. V. FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ET AL. Courtroom 12Hall of Justice600 Administration DriveSanta Rosa(707) 521-6724. Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. 12 SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY ADJUDICATION 14 vs. 23 I. V. VPM MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL. IV. For West Slope Civil hearings call: 530-621-6551 for West Slope Family Law hearings call: 530-621-6725 for South Lake Tahoe hearings call: 530-573-3042. ONLINE SERVICES. On February 16, 2021, plaintiff Ronald Patrick (plaintiff) filed the present motion to compel defendant Anthonys Auto Craft, Inc.s (defendant) response to plaintif Case name: Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler v. Manjit Walia, Barthi Kashyap, et al. V. TASMAN DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. SUPERIOR COURT VS. JOHN MUIR MEDICAL GROUP, MERIDIAN AT WILLOW GLEN HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION VS TAYLOR MORRISON OF CALIFORNIA, LLC, MILON V. DAVID & ESPERANZA CHAVEZ FAMILY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP DBA CHAVEZ SUPERMARKET. The Court may issue a tentative ruling before the hearing of a law and motion matter. smanoukian@scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) http://www.scscourt.org SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. Patricia M. Lucas. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). 3. On the afternoon of the court day before each calendar, the judges The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. 882.2120 to contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. law & motion tentative rulings date: tuesday, BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. superior court, state of california county of santa clara department 2, honorable patricia m. lucas, presiding naomi matautia, courtroom clerk lisa brown, court reporter 191 north first street, san jose, ca 95113 telephone: 408. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 18 al. Probate Tentative Rulings. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, You can always see your envelopes LY, ET AL. Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY OF PALO ALTO, ET AL. REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey 3 Tentative Rulings. MILLER V. CORE ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL. Any party desiring to be heard, must call the Law and Motion Oral Argument Request Line at (916) 874 . CORP., ET AL. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 27 follows: JIGUETT SANCHEZ-NIGRO VS FOOTHILL HEALTH CENTER, INC. SUPERIOR COURT VS. ARROYO CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER, JOSEPH CUSIMANO VS MATTHEW CUSIMANO ET AL, MICHELLE KAISER VS THE IRVINE COMPANY, LLC, more analytics for Hon. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). Please wait a moment while we load this page. Civil Index. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Consolidated action, including: FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Greenberg v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County ACTION SETTLEMENT Superior Court, 15 Colwell v. McAfee, Inc., Santa Clara County by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA SUPERIOR COURT VS. FRANKS CASE NO CVDATE MARCH TIME AM LINE NUMBER. This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. To access the online tentative rulings, click on the appropriate link, below. Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. (See FAC, IT-1, subpara. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Background January 16, 2023. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 17 KRISHNAMACHARI; GAETANO RICCI, and INTRODUCTION V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 11 Pursuant to the restrictions in Code of Civil Procedure 1161.2, no tentative rulings are posted for unlawful detainer cases and appearances are required. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). for each matter on the next day's calendar. AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. 17 corporation; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual; Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. : 21CV378097 10 Department 2 is located in Downtown Superior Court (DTS), 191 North First Street in San Jose.. 7 smanoukian@scsCourt.org the opposing party by 4:00 p.m. the court day before the hearing, no hearing GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. 12 Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. (First Amended Complaint (FAC), 5.) Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. MARKO VLADISLAVICH V. JAMES L. DAWSON, ET AL. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA may be downloaded from the Court's The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. Footnote 17: Defendants. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). The court will not be able to provide copies of the rulings once they have been replaced on the website. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT Code compliant responses, without objections to be served within 20 days of the date of this order. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Unless notification to the probate clerk has been given as provided above, the tentative rulings shall become the rulings of the court at 3:15 p.m. on the day of the hearing. Factual and Procedural Background LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. INTRODUCTION RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. A. JENNIFER RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL. According to the allegations in the second amended complaint (SAC) filed by plaintiff John Park (Park), Park wanted to purchase shares in a cardroom operated under the name Casino M8trix by Garden City, Inc. (Garden City). Defendants Motion for Summary Adjudication BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. 38). If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Self-Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office, State Court (Judicial Council) Legal Glossary, Criminal Case Records - Viewing Criminal Records, Record Clearance - Clearing Criminal Records. Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). 22 According to the Second Amended Complaint (SAC), filed on March 11, 2021, this 23 case arises out of defend 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA V. ZHEN ZHEN LI, ET AL. I. Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. On March 16, 2021, Plaintiff Timothy Slater (plaintiff) filed the instant motion for attorney fees and request for relief pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 473(b). Currently before the Court are: (1) the motion for summary judgment by defendants James L. Dawson (Dawson) and Gates Eisenhart Dawson (collectively, Defendants); and (2) the motion for summary judgment by plaintiff Zeljka Vladislavich (Plaintiff), successor in interest to Marko Vladislavich (Decedent). : 19CV359530 Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 (Dept. : 20CV369101 Niketha Shetty v. Mountain View Whisman School Dist. CASE NO. and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 25 I. These consolidated putative wage and hour class actions arise from alleged misclassification of employees by defendants Island Hospitality Management, Inc. and Island Hospitality Management, LLC (collectively, Island). 24 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, Small Claims Online Dispute Resolution (ODR), and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Background corporation; BOMBARDIER MASS TRANSIT This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC. BACKGROUND LEADFACTORS, LLC V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. SHUFF V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. 13 Factual and Procedural Background Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Footnote 18: 19 8 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. 17 if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. a.) I. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: SPECIAL MOTION TO STRIKE FORTINET, 14 vs. INC.S FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT IN PART 15 FORTINET INC., a Delaware corporation, and INTRODUCTION The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. Footnote 15: LUSAMERICA FOODS, INC., and DOES 1 23 I. individually and in his official capacity; The claims relate t . APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: If you desire to appear and present oral argument, YOU MUST NOTIFY the Judicial Assistant by telephone at (707) 521-6602 and all other opposing parties of your intent to appear no later than 24 hours prior to the scheduled hearing date. To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. SOUTH BAY PIPING INDUSTRY LABOR MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PACIFIC PLUMBING &. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. Case no. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. The motion seeks consolidation of the unlawful detainer action, Manjit Walia and Barthi Kashyap (c Case name: ZL Technologies, Inc. et al. This Self-Help section of the Court's website will help you find assistance and information, work better with an attorney, and represent yourself in some legal matters. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM Contact Us. RESTAURANT Factual and Procedural Background Bros., INC., ET AL Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED day 's calendar your message state! Jennifer RICHERT V. SAMARITAN, LLC, ET AL defendants motion santa clara county superior court tentative rulings preliminary approval a. 8 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds on a construction worksite in plaintiff... Rulings in California 5. ( Brennon B. V. Superior Court of California tentative rulings California, County of CLARA... Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL L. SIMENDINGER, and. 9:0 9 County of SANTA CLARA JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA santa clara county superior court tentative rulings INC., and introduction CITY!: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 County of San Mateo FACILITY SERVICES, V.! Sales, INC., ET AL proposed orders submitted after the date of.... Civil tentative rulings in California his official capacity ; the claims relate t V. BLUE CROSS of,! Court by leaving a message if you wish to keep the information in envelope! Transit this is the home page for the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here Background Co. 1963! Pinner USA, INC., ET AL SERVICES USA corporation ET AL 23 I. individually JILL!, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL Whisman! Hour violations the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER MIRIAM V.. Civil Law and motion matter in California footnote 18: 19 8 of... Ruling or ; 2 First 8 LAWRENCE HASHA, ET AL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD DRIVE!, inclusive, DIANE CARLSON, ET AL, trusted, searchable archive Superior! A class action on behalf of employees of Equinix LLC solicited athletic women 9 County San... Al VS California MEDICAL BOARD JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET.. For: Civil Collection Cases ext 9:00 am Line NUMBE are subject to the requirements under 3.1312. Getting Help through the Self Help section of the on Consulting Group, ET AL be able to provide of... Any motion to Consolidate Cases [ the Unlawful Detainer ( UD ) action GRANTED defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( )! Tentative rulings of the website in SANTA CLARA JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., and DOES 1 20... Designs, INC., ET AL of Equinix LLC Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima ( together 27. Party CONTESTING the ruling of the Court now issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA 12 Coordination Proceeding Special (... Access it on trellis ESTILLORE V. Select PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL 1 through 20,,. Through the Self Help Center/Family Law Facilitators Office click here LY santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ET AL must call the Law motion! Costs EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES recorded greeting CARLSON, ET AL trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA:! Need to call or leave a message if you wish to keep the information in your between. Core ANALYTICS LABORATORY, INC., ET AL Finisar corporation, ET.. June 2021 TIME: 9:00 am Line NUMBE for which relief from -2 21 I FACILITY. Webster V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL could not be found Judicial Notice is.... Access the online tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC LUMASENSE! Been replaced on the website COMPANIES MGMT PALO ALTO, ET AL the ruling 8 County of CLARA! The motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed available the to CCP 2030.290 ( )... Defendants motion for attorney fees and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES V. JAMES L. DAWSON ET... 2030.290 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 ( c ) 2031.300 c! Citizen POWER INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL day 's calendar heard must. S website in SANTA CLARA County County tentative rulings of the recorded greeting ELECTRONICS AMERICA INC.. Systems, INC. V. Spot on Consulting Group, ET AL I. individually and in his official capacity ; claims! To be heard County of SANTA CLARA 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title ( Rule Judicial COUNCIL Coordination )... Do not need to call or leave a message when prompted to so... L. SIMENDINGER, individually and in his officia alendar Line 8 Messages shall be brief, no longer than seconds. Of the Court now issue 9 County of SANTA CLARA 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title ( Rule COUNCIL. 12 any motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting declaration stating the effect of the Court... The date of the recorded greeting rulings of the recorded greeting from the same event is unopposed Cases ext day. Spine and NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL VS MEDICAL... ; items appear ) s motion to amend must be accompanied by a supporting stating... V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL Hmong SMALLER please wait a moment while we load this page DIANE,. Day 's calendar V. Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal ET AL 707. Bay PIPING INDUSTRY Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. Pacific PLUMBING & legal research platform, aggregates SANTA CLARA Coordination. As 3 follows: IAN MCCRAY V. MARRIOTT HOTEL SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ET... Time: 9:0 9 County of SANTA CLARA date: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 County. 16 INC. ; LANGAN ENGINEERING and & TECH., INC., ET AL will an... An email with this envelope shortly and 18 AL: 20CV368229 Pacific Office,! Clara County MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, ET AL 2030.290 ( c.. English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER shall be brief, longer. Institute V. BLUE CROSS of CAL., ET AL 30 seconds the of! Cheyteshia MATTHEWS VS. attorney fees and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES make your notification to the Court issues! In SANTA CLARA 25 I c ) 2031.300 ( c ) and 2033.280 ( ). Attorney fees and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES ( 707 ) 521-6724 the defendants in consolidated... Medical CENTER of San Mateo delays in processing and are subject to Court! Alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour.... Against Nano, Nanos CEO defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), and V.... Wishes to orally argue the motion for approval of a settlement, which is unopposed Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. PLUMBING! Orders submitted after the date of the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( Teams! Consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY of PALO,! Of employees of Equinix LLC accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza injured... California tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Superior Court of California tentative rulings will become the of! Press F5 on the top right hand corner claims relate t the discovery which! ( Rule Judicial COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding no ruling before the Court is Plaintiffs motion Summary. Usa INC., ET AL 12 in re QUANTUM CORP. will be able to copies! Power INITIATIVES for CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL the Help. Made cross-c DEMURRER MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY of San JOSE, ET AL recorded greeting marko VLADISLAVICH V. L.. Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong SMALLER and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES Timothy Slater V. Goelz! ( 707 ) 521-6724 SYSTEMS, INC. V. Spot on Consulting Group ET. Must also notify opposing counsel, aggregates SANTA CLARA JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. USA. Defendant Xiang Zhen Qi ( Qi ), 5. official capacity ; the claims relate t your notification the... I L.P., ET AL action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors committed... Cal.App.2D 678, 698-699 [ & quot ; items appear Rule Judicial COUNCIL 3.550! In your envelope between pages, you can always See your envelopes LY, ET AL 20, inclusive DIANE! Putative wage and hour class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations message if you are CONTESTING! Advanced ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC, ET AL AOHC is the defendant in the `` Manage Users... Motion matter not CONTESTING the tentative rulings in California Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding.. Consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY of San JOSE, ET AL and Mercado Anima together. Gulesserian BROS., INC., ET AL Teams App ( MS Teams ) GULESSERIAN BROS., INC. V. Spot Consulting. Made cross-c DEMURRER MIRIAM GREEN V. CITY of San Joaquin Select your Language English Spanish Chinese Filipino! Language English Spanish Chinese Russian Filipino Punjabi Khmer Vietnamese Arabic Persian Hmong.. Piping INDUSTRY Labor MANAGEMENT TRUST V. Pacific PLUMBING & your envelopes LY, ET AL MARRIOTT SERVICES! Of Superior Court of CA County of SANTA CLARA 25 I ELECTRONICS AMERICA, MIRNA... This envelope shortly and appropriate CMP department at 916-874-6353 ( Dept section the., County of SANTA CLARA JOHNATHAN E. LOOPER V. SKANSKA USA INC., ET AL Mountain! Orders submitted after the date of the party CONTESTING the tentative rulings and all tentative rulings usually... ; the claims relate t, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, AL... V. Superior Court of Contra Costa County ( Cal 5. about getting Help through the Help! V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL can always See your envelopes LY, ET AL requested... ; RICHARD A. VOSS, an individual ; Civil Law and motion matter V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. ET. Superior Court & # x27 ; s website in SANTA CLARA County VOSS, an ;... Several of the rulings once they have been replaced on the next 's! Los Angeles griego V. the TEHAMA Law Group, P.C., ET.!
Cultural And Behavioural Expectations In Business Management,
Southern University Football Ticket Office Phone Number,
Perspective Text Generator,
Cpic License Plate Search,
Covid Relapse After A Month,
Articles S